Vincent Jenkins - Police Misconduct

Vincent Jenkins (Warith Habib Abdal); sexual assault, robbery; NRE: mistaken witness identification, false/misleading forensic evidence, police officer misconduct

Suggestibilty issues

C3 [164] "In the early 1980s, a man named Vincent Jenkins (who later changed his name to Warith Habib Abdal) was doing time for a rape he said he did not commit. Later DNA tests excluded him as the perpetrator, but the [DA] fought to keep him in prison. [165] [U.S.] District Judge John T. Elfvin of the Western District of New York, who was in poor health, granted habeas corpus relief, and Abdal was freed after serving seventeen years in prison. Elfvin's action apparently represents the only known instance in which a federal judge has granted habeas corpus relief on a simple assertion of innocence..."

NRE synopsis (by Rob Warden):

"On May 18, 1982, Leslie A. Werner, a 23-year-old white woman, was raped and robbed in an Erie County...nature preserve where she had been bird-watching with her husband. She described her attacker as a black man between five feet eight and five feet ten with a space between his upper front teeth and a 'tenor-type' voice.

"Warith Habib Abdal, a 43-year-old African-American then known as Vincent H. Jenkins, did not fit this description. He was six feet two inches tall, there was no gap between his teeth, and he had a deep voice. Nonetheless, he was picked up for questioning about the crime* four-and-a-half months after it occurred."

[* Why? Because he was black and 'available,' and they just needed to solve this crime?]

"Abdal was presented to Werner in a one-man show-up, but she failed to identify him as her attacker. She then viewed a photograph of Abdal that was four years old.* She returned to the show-up and identified him.

[* First of all, a one-man 'show-up' is just about as suggestive as you can get. But then, even though she fails to identify him, they show him an old photo of the guy, and at that point she 'identifies' him? And what if she hadn't? Would the 'detectives' here simply have continued to show her photos of Jenkins/Abdal until she did? ]

"Based on Werner's identification, an Erie County grand jury indicted Abdal for first-degree rape, sodomy, and second-degree robbery.

"Before his trial opened on May 31, 1983, Judge Frederick M. Marshall suppressed the pre-trial identification, calling the police identification procedure 'highly improper.'

"Marshall nevertheless permitted Werner to identify Abdal in court based on a supposed 'Braille-type' recollection from touching his face during the rape.* No other evidence purported to link Abdal to the crime. A forensic analyst trstified that he had compared a Negroid eyelash recovered from Werner at the hospital where she was treated after the attack and found it was dissimilar to Abdal's eyelashes, but he said it was 'not unusual for different hairs to come from the same person.' This was a claim that had no scientific basis."

[* Having examined thousands of sex cases, we have never heard of this sort of 'evidence' used in court.]

"One June 6, 1983, the jury convicted Abdal of all charges. On November 4, 1983, Marshall sentenced him to prison for twenty years to life. On July 10, 1987, the Appellate Division..affirmed the conviction.

"Following the advent of DNA forensic technology, which did not come into being until long after Abdal had exhausted his state appeals, his appellate lawyer, Eleanor Jackson Piel, filed a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus. At Piel's request, on February 10, 1992, Senior U.S. District Court Judge John T. Elfvin ordered DNA testing of vaginal swabs and slides collected from Werner at the hospital after the attack. The testing was done by Dr. David Bing of CBR Laboratories in Boston, but the results were inconclusive.

"Then, at Piel's request, Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project joined Abdal's legal team. In the hope of resolving the ambiguities in Bing's work, Piel and Scheck arranged for new testing by Cellmark Diagnostics in Germantown, Maryland. In late 1998, the Erie County Forensic Science Laboratory sent the swabs and slides to Cellmark via Federal Express, but the evidence was lost in transit. The DNA samples prepared five years earlier by Dr. Bing still existed, however, and from these Dr. Edward T. Blake of Forensic Science Associates in Richmond, California, performed tests in 1999 conclusively establishing Abdal's innocence.

"After Blake's results were confirmed by the Erie County Forensic Science Laboratory, on August 31, 1999, Judge Elfvin ordered Abdal freed. The next day, Abdal was released from the maximum-security Green Haven Correctional Facility in Stormville, although he still faced a possible retrial.

"On November 2, 1999, Supreme Court Justice Joseph P. McCarthy, the supervising judge for western New York criminal courts, dismissed the indictment.

"In January 2002, a Court of Claims action brought by Abdal was settled for $2 million -- $323.62 for each of the 6,180 days he was wrongfully incarcerated. He did not have long to enjoy the money. On September 19, 2005, he died of cancer at age sixty-six. In 2009, his estate settled a state court lawsuit against the City of Buffalo for $1.2 million."

[All emphases added unless otherwise noted.]

 

Perversion of Justice

Is deliberately finding someone guilty of things he did not do ever justified? If we convict people for acts of child sexual abuse that never happened, does that somehow 'make up' for all the past abuse that went completely unpunished? Is it okay to pervert justice in order to punish people wrongly perceived as perverts?

Learn More